 |
We will secure the highest level of safety and welfare for
all staff by providing effective supervision, training and
systems of work.
Shropshire Fire
and Rescue Service (Strategic Aim No 3)
|
The range and complexity of incidents fire fighters now attend,
and the inherent dangers to which they are subsequently exposed
is ever increasing. Continuous examination ensures our organisation
further enhances the already excellent equipment and training provided.
One of the more recent initiatives this process has produced is
a review of Shropshire Fire and Rescue Service’s safe systems
of work for crews working at height. This is not a luxury, but
rather a legal requirement in that Regulation 13 of the Workplace
(Health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992, states:
| |
As far as reasonably practical,
suitable and sufficient steps must be taken to prevent
any person at work from falling a distance of 2 metres or
more, or any distance likely to cause injury. |
With other Health and Safety Legislation requirements,
and the historic systems of work, there was a requirement to introduce
more acceptable work procedures.
Project Team
The Line Safety team comprises of seven Specialist Instructors
and ADO Mike Ablitt.
All our Specialist Instructors are operational Fire fighters who
since “volunteering” have undergone comprehensive training
in; industrial rope access techniques, methods of instruction skills,
and examination and assessment procedures.
Where to Start?
We consulted with a number of brigades and we are indebted
to Nottinghamshire Fire Service who shared their work with us in
the early stages of the project. Regrettably there is little by
way of current national guidance for Brigades. IRATA provides copious
guidance to industry, but this is of limited use in providing for
the unique needs of the Fire Service. A draft Home Office Circular: “Guidance & Compliance
Framework for the Use of Ropes, Harnesses & Associated Equipment
in the Fire Service” has recently been issued for comment.
We have ensured that our initiative encapsulates the guidance provided
within this proposal.
An Adaptable and Simple Approach
At the inception of the project, it became clear that we could not provide
a prescribed technique to suit each and every scenario a fire-fighter might
encounter. The range and permeations are just too great. Subsequently, our
training methodology is based upon a non prescriptive range of adaptable
core skills, which can be applied to suit any given situation encountered.
Our terms of reference made it clear that we were to identify
and develop a system of line safety, not line rescue. It would
have been easy to develop a complex and highly technical system,
the net result of which would have been almost certain failure
of the initiative. The team therefore developed the training on
the principal of “keep it simple”.
Our students are taught four work systems:
|
|
|
Restraint (preventing personnel getting too close to a risk) |
|
|
|
Fall arrest (stopping them from falling) |
|
|
|
Work positioning (enabling operators to get to a work site
safely such as on a steep embankment) |
|
|
|
Lowering & hauling (lowering or recovering a casualty safely) |
The whole ethos is that of a risk assessed approach. This encourages
fire-fighters to examine all the alternatives available to them,
and where possible seek an engineered solution rather than automatically
committing crews to high risk situations.
We provide training for all operational members of the Brigade
both Whole-time and Retained. This means training almost 500 personnel,
taking a total of 24 months to achieve. Training is delivered via
a “three phase” approach and all stages are assessable.
These comprise;
Phase 1 - Local input by Station “Lay Instructors”
This comprised of the non-risk elements of the training such as;
risk assessments, knots, testing and maintenance, and so on.
Phase 2
A two day course held at our Shrewsbury training venue and conducted by the
Specialist Line Safety Instructors. This includes all the practical input
and is totally scenario based.
Phase 3
A series of half day seminars for Officers who have; a command, specialist
or supervisory role. The seminars identify how the project impacts on their
specific functions, and how they can contribute towards the success of the
initiative.
Equipment
The equipment was selected by the Instructors and purchased from “Lyon
Safety Equipment Ltd”. We have developed a good relationship with Lyon,
and we are very happy with the quality and reliability of the equipment provided.
Each Line Safety Pack (one per appliance) comprises;
|
|
|
Four 60cm and four 120cm Tape slings |
|
|
|
Four 60cm and four 120cm Tape slings |
|
|
|
Two 50 meter lines |
|
|
|
A rescue harness |
|
|
|
A full body harness |
|
|
|
Safety lanyard |
|
|
|
Belay/Descender device |
|
|
|
Pulley |
|
|
|
Ascender |
|
|
|
6 Carabineers |
|
|
|
3 Maillons |
|
|
|
2 Scaffold hooks |
|
|
|
Large kit-bag |
|
|
|
A complete pack cost approximately £350 each |
Auditing and Validation
The course has been audited throughout. This includes:
|
|
|
An independent external auditor (GHSS) |
|
|
|
Our own “Performance Review Officer” |
|
|
|
H&SE who have expressed their own endorsement of the
project |
|
|
|
The HMI have cited it as “an example of “good
practice” |
|
|
|
Student assessment is employed through all stages of their
development |
|
|
|
And finally, to ensure the theory works in practice, feedback
is being provided by flexible duty officers when they attend
incidents |
|